NCADC, National Meeting, October 1999

Anick and Oneeka Danjinou....... Salome
Isaac Macharia Tyson . . . Sauda
Nkopi, Lal Mohammed,Brian and Taanisa
West Midlands ADC hosted NCADCs national meeting in Birmingham on
Saturday 9th October. This was the largest meeting yet - well done
to all concerned in organising the meeting and encouraging people
to attend. There were seven new campaigns, and we also heard updates
from 17 other campaigns.
Pauline Akwa , from London, came to the UK in 1998. She was taken
to the police station and her passport and children were taken away
from her. She is not allowed to work or claim benefits. She is campaigning
with International Black Women for Wages for Housework.
Ben Amoah has lived in the UK for 18 years. He left Ghana after
being attacked by soldiers. His wife suffered a miscarriage after
a beating. He has had three hearings and a deportation order was
made against him in the summer. He is campaigning with Newham Churches
Immigration Group and hopes to get a JR of his case.
Lal Mohammed and his aunt Sauda Nkopi came to the UK from Tanzania
in 1995. They were refused asylum in 1996. Their campaign has support
from Lal’s school. They have held protests and sent petitions
to the Home Office.
Isaac Macharia Muraya came to the UK from Kenya in 1997. He was
held in detention for 7 weeks. His case is now being reviewed by
the Home Office.
Hussein Kasujja came to the UK from Uganda in 1990. He was detained
in Tynsley House for seventeen months before being granted bail.
He won a Judicial Review of his case last summer. He is supported
by PayDay Men’s Network.
Anick and Oneeka Danjinou who won their family campaign earlier
this year.
There was a discussion on strategy including campaigning against
the Immigration & Asylum Bill. It was agreed that NCADC continue
to participate in the Coalition for Asylum & Immigration Rights
(CAIR) and to donate £200 towards that organisation’s
work. We also agreed to endorse the Women Against Rape statement
of opposition to the Immigration Bill, and to affiliate to the National
Assembly Against Racism. In the discussion it was stressed that
we need to reach more people and build broader campaigns - by holding
meetings, demonstrations and lobbies.
A paper on whether to support all campaigns was discussed. There
was also discussion on how and when to campaign, the danger of fast-track
removals that give no time to gather evidence, and the break-up
of families that results from UK immigration policy.
The next National Meeting will take place in Manchester at the
Methodist Central Hall, on Saturday 26th February. 2000. Contact
your nearest campaign or NCADC direct if you would like to attend.

Shafiq-ur-Rehman in another deportation battle
Shafiq-ur-Rehman, a mullah in Oldham, won his battle against deportation
after a ground-breaking appeal in September. He was the first person
to have his case heard before the new Special Immigration Appeals
Commission, which considers cases affecting national security. The
Commission ruled that he should not be deported.
A Home Office bid to appeal against the decision was rejected. But
now Home Secretary Jack Straw has been given permission to take
its case for deporting Mr ur-Rehman to the Court of Appeal.
Doris
Omoregie has suffered another setback in her family's campaign to
remain in the UK and to bring her husband Frank back from Nigeria.
Early in 1999 a concession was introduced by the Home Office, saying
that minors who had been living in the UK more than seven years
would not normally be deported, and that if their parents were here
they would be allowed to remain with them.
Representation was made to the Home Office on behalf of Doris' eldest
son, Benjamin, who is eight years old and born in the UK. Benjamin
and Doris fit the criteria but the Home Office rejected the application,
inferring that Doris has been 'playing the game' ("Mrs Omoregie
has chosen to delay the families removal for 42 months").
This decision seems totally irrational - the concession is for children
and the action of the parents should not influence the way the claim
is considered. Children do not have any choice over where they are
born.
|