James Doherty
, The Scotsman, Wednesday 4th December 2002
http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/index.cfm?id=1347702002
The Home
Office could face a multi-million-pound compensation bill
after an asylum-seeker launched a landmark court case, claiming
a decision to force him to stay in Glasgow breached his human
rights.
Mehmet
Gezer, a Turkish-Kurd, says the National Asylum Support Service
(NASS) failed to protect him and his family from "sustained
and serious" racist abuse after they were sent to high-rise
accommodation in the Toryglen area.
Mr Gezer,
51, who fled detention and torture in his native land, said
his wife, Altun, 44, and two of his four children were verbally
and physically abused by racist youths just days after arriving
in the city on 6 September last year.
Glasgow
has well-documented problems with asylum seekers. In August
2001, Firsat Dag, 25, a Turkish-Kurd, was stabbed to death
in Sighthill. Last Friday, Masood Gomroki, 32, an Iranian,
was stabbed by a gang in what police are treating as a racially
motivated incident.
Stephanie
Harrison, Mr Gezers counsel, told the High Court in
London that the family were sworn at, spat on, threatened
with dogs and had their home attacked by three white males
who threatened to stab Mr Gezers son, Ibrahim, Stephanie
Harrison, 13.
During
the final attack on 27 October, 2001, the youths allegedly
kicked in the front door and smashed windows before a neighbouring
asylum-seeker heard their screams and alerted police by pressing
a panic button which had been installed by authorities after
previous attacks.
The family
were moved by Strathclyde Police to emergency accommodation.
Officers later confirmed that the attack was racially motivated.
Mr Gezer,
who has been treated by the Medical Foundation for the Victims
of Torture, moved his two youngest children back to London,
where his oldest sons, Hasan, 25 and Huseyin, 23, had won
refugee status. However, the court heard that in November
2001, NASS ordered the family back to the flat in Glasgow,
insisting it was a reasonable request while it investigated
the incident.
Mr Gezer,
supported by the Refugee Council, told the Home Office that
his children were terrified of returning and pleaded with
NASS to allow his family to remain in London, where there
is an established Turkish-Kurd community - or disperse them
anywhere else but Glasgow.
However,
on 22 November NASS told the family it was satisfied that
it was safe for them to return to the flat in Toryglen. When
the Gezers refused, their financial support, including housing
benefit, was withdrawn. Although granted subsistence level
vouchers, it is claimed the family did not receive their first
food voucher until 30 December because of a "clerical error".
Ms Harrison
claimed that NASS should have been aware that there was a
"real risk" that the family would be subjected to "harm" on
the Glasgow estate, which Strathclyde Police have identified
as being second only to Sighthill in terms of serious racially
motivated attacks.
She further
claimed that the family had suffered "inhuman and degrading
treatment" at the hands of NASS.
The hearing,
before Mr Justice Goldring, continues tomorrow. It is expected
to hear evidence that the Gezers youngest children,
Esme, 16, and Ibrahim, suffered psychological trauma which
required treatment.
If the
claim is successful, the Home Office could be liable for damages
approaching £60,000.
At any
one time in Glasgow, about 7,000 asylum-seekers are relocated.
Peter Barry, the manager of the Scottish Refugee Council,
said the case could lead to further claims.
He said:
"If successful, this case would set some kind of precedent,
and would alert people to a place where they can express their
grievance, because there are a large number of asylum-seekers
and refugees who feel very aggrieved about being victims of
violent and racist attacks. Many do feel vulnerable and exposed
in Glasgow."
*Refugee
sues over living in Glasgow
The Scotsman, website is difficult to access, due to restricted
band with on their website, NCADC has produced the article
in full to assist those with limted band width access to the
internet