| Private
security firms suggest new removals regime
By Harmit Athwal, ©
Institute of Race Relations,28 January 2003, 5:00pm
Group 4 Falck, Britain's
biggest immigration detention company, today called for the right to report
'disruptive' detainees to the immigration authorities so that asylum seekers'
behaviour in detention be taken into account when decisions on refugee
status are made.
At the House of Commons,
members of the Home Affairs Committee on Removals questioned representatives
from private companies involved in the immigration removals process.
The companies - Wackenhut,
Group 4 Falck, Global Solutions Ltd, Premier Custodial Group and UK Detention
Services - are all currently involved in the detention of refugees. Loss
Prevention International is the sole contractor for deporting detainees
from the UK and Wackenhut transports asylum seekers arriving in the South
East around the UK under the dispersal scheme run by the National Asylum
Support Service.
David Banks from Group
4 Falck, now the largest private prison 'service provider' in the UK,
told the committee that, 'detainees who act in a violent or disruptive
manner should have their behaviour taken into account by the immigration
authorities and Immigration Adjudicator. The current inability of an adjudicator
to take such behaviour into account poses a significant danger to the
wider community, especially if leave to remain is granted to individuals
who pose a criminal threat.' But Frances Webber, a leading immigration
barrister, told IRR News: 'It appears that Group 4 Falck is jumping on
the anti-asylum bandwagon and trying to create another asylum scare. Its
suggestion that criminal or violent behaviour in detention cannot be taken
into account by immigration authorities is mischievous and wrong. The
criminal law provides adequate safeguards against violence, and there
is power to deport those convicted of offences. But allegations of violence
- by Group 4 or anyone else - should have to be tested in the ordinary
criminal courts; we know from past experience that their evidence is not
always reliable.'
On the issue of deportation,
Tom Davies of Loss Prevention International Ltd, commented that a charter
flight was the most 'cost effective' way of removing people and it was
'more humane to remove on a charter flight because it is out of the public
eye and therefore the temperature of the thing is much lower'.
When the companies were
questioned about attempted suicides and 'successful' suicides of asylum
seekers in their care, they gave figures for attempted suicides, but all
insisted that no suicide attempt had been successful. However, the Institute
of Race Relations' records show otherwise. In fact, there have been two
suicides of detained asylum seekers at Harmondsworth detention centre,
run by Group 4 at the time.
* Lithuanian asylum seeker
Robertas Grabys, 49, was found hanged in Harmondsworth detention centre
on 24 January 2000. The Home Office had attempted to deport Robertas two
days prior to his death.
* Kimpua Nsimba was found
hanged on 16 June 1990 at Harmondsworth Detention Centre. He arrived in
the UK ten days earlier and had been detained at Heathrow. The day before
his death when he did not come down for food, Group 4 searched the building.
When he was not found, it was reported that he had absconded. A cleaner
found his body the next day. Group 4 could not explain how he was missed
the day before.
© Institute of Race
Relations 2003
Source for
this page: ©
Institute of Race Relations 2003
==============
Disclaimer:
NCADC's web site is an important part of our
work in educating the public on immigration, asylum and anti-deportation
issues. As part of that work our web site hosts news and views from different
individuals, organisations and campaigns working in the same field as
us. The contents of named/signed articles are the sole responsibility
of the author/s and are not necessarily endorsed by NCADC.
|