Time for the 'Regularization' of all 'irregular'
migrants?
"Deporting hundreds of thousands of irregular migrants, particularly
those who have been in the UK for many years, is simply not feasible
or desirable"
An independent think tank, the *'Institute for Public Policy Research'
(IPPR), has issued a report called 'Irregular migration in the
UK'. In it they say: 'deporting hundreds of thousands of irregular
migrants, particularly those who have been in the UK for many years,
is simply not feasible or desirable.'
"Nobody likes illegal immigration. And the subject is a deeply
difficult one for politicians to tackle. But the bare truth is
that we are not going to deport hundreds of thousands of people
from the UK. Our economy would shrink and we would notice it straightaway
in uncleaned offices, dirty streets and unstaffed pubs and clubs.
So we have a choice: make people live in the shadows, exploited
and fearful for the future; or bring them into the mainstream,
to pay taxes and live an honest life." Nick Pearce, Director
IPPR.
Backed up with well-reasoned argument, the report should make
compelling reading for Charles Clarke, Tony McNulty and especially
the Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown.
Simply put, IPPR argue that regularising those already here without
papers would economically benefit us all. At present those working
without permission may be working for "cash in hand" and
only contribute tax revenues through VAT when they buy goods with
the money they earn. Having status would allow them to work legally
and pay income tax. IPPR estimate that this could put an extra £1
billion a year into the Treasury. Where as the cost of trying to
deport those without status might cost around £4.7 billion.
Spain, who have regularized their undocumented workers, estimate
that their economy benefited to the tune of £750 million
last year and expect that to rise to £1,350 million this
year.
10.2% of taxes raised each year come from regularized economic
migrants. Though they only represent 8.7% of the population, they
pay an average of £7,203 compared with £6,861 of the
resident population.
Not taken into account by the statisticians are the vast numbers
of irregular migrants who are on firm's payrolls and pay full income
tax. We are more than sure the Inland Revenue are well aware of
this and have been for decades but have never complained.
IPPR research has been thorough and though not an argument for
economic migration, it is a convincing argument that those irregular
migrants already here should become economic residents.
NCADC welcomed the family amnesty but felt it should have been
an amnesty for all claiming/failed asylum seekers and irregular
migrants in the UK. We hope Charles, Tony and Gordon read the IPPR
report, take serious note of its contents and our message to the
trio is:
It is time for the 'Regularization' of all irregular migrants
John O for NCADC
End of Bulletin:
*The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) is the UK's leading
progressive think tank and was established in 1988. Its role is
to bridge the political divide between the social democratic and
liberal traditions, the intellectual divide between academia and
the policy making establishment and the cultural divide between
government and civil society. It is first and foremost a research
institute, aiming to provide innovative and credible policy solutions.
Its work, the questions its research poses, and the methods it
uses are driven by the belief that the journey to a good society
is one that places social justice, democratic participation, economic
and environmental sustainability at its core.
http://www.ippr.org.uk/ |